![whats the point of multiple desktops on mac whats the point of multiple desktops on mac](https://img.webnots.com/2018/08/Show-Desktop-using-Trackpad-Gesture.jpg)
- #WHATS THE POINT OF MULTIPLE DESKTOPS ON MAC FOR MAC#
- #WHATS THE POINT OF MULTIPLE DESKTOPS ON MAC FULL#
- #WHATS THE POINT OF MULTIPLE DESKTOPS ON MAC DOWNLOAD#
- #WHATS THE POINT OF MULTIPLE DESKTOPS ON MAC MAC#
These is another reason I would like to see the the WebAcc development speed up: it would to awesome if we could integrate it with the upcoming LibreOffice Online Solution.
![whats the point of multiple desktops on mac whats the point of multiple desktops on mac](https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/a100.jpg)
#WHATS THE POINT OF MULTIPLE DESKTOPS ON MAC MAC#
I think once the Mac and Linux (desktop/device) world grows even bigger Microsoft will not hesitate to bring Exchange to Linux if they have to. If that means open sourcing (part) of these solutions to get Red Hat and Canonical on GW (and OES) train so be it. That would change the playing field where we would not have heavy Windows/Exchange competition.
#WHATS THE POINT OF MULTIPLE DESKTOPS ON MAC FOR MAC#
What -I- would do it try to make GW the default collaboration platform for Mac and Linux, but still supporting existing Windows. Not only for GW, but also for like OES that is an opportunity. As mentioned Mac is (still) on fire and Apple is not providing a (real) 'server' component for that world. On Windows these functional component fe could be an api allowing easy integration with GW using. I would say then start an open source client project to build a cross platform Client/components/widgets and function components. 2) I would opt to see if it makes sense if the GW Client could be split in an 'cross platform engine' (protocol, local database, authentication, security, integration) part and a 'client' (on Windows that would be the client front end as we know it) part. That brings me to what I would do: imo we could take two paths (near at the same time): 1) Make a GREAT WebAccess, that should the be easy part, and Support protocol standards. point is: Micro Focus would -never- be able to make everybody happy. As a mac user I would love to see my GW client look like it was created by Steve Jobs himself (simple!), but on Linux should it use Gnome/KDE/. I sure would opt for the last one, as I believe a general Windows user would love to see an Windows (read Office) like GroupWise experience. One of the problems I see if such a project would start is how that would look like would it look like a Windows GW Client, something new, or platform dependent.
#WHATS THE POINT OF MULTIPLE DESKTOPS ON MAC FULL#
I doubt that a full featured client will ever happen. This allows us to give the best native experience without recreating another full featured client. So, missing pieces of GW while using native applications on a platform could be solved by offering an 'app' that just perform that specific missing piece, but in a neat way. We do not want apps on a device that do all in one app, cause it makes switching between those functions harder. The main reason people tend to use those default device apps is they give the best experience managing mail, task, using calendar etc. I do not like that one:) As I said we like multiple easy apps with a limited set of functions. It should also be able to take care of the 'send to' like functions. Maybe we could make a small app on those platforms that starts WebAcc in a frame so it looks and feels as a real device app. Those need a full featured WebAcc client. Now the GW Admin part is finished, its now time to go back to the webacc part and make it on par with or (I prefer) even better than the Windows client! Here in the Netherlands are quite some schools are using iPads and Chromebooks.
![whats the point of multiple desktops on mac whats the point of multiple desktops on mac](https://i0.wp.com/www.chriswrites.com/wp-content/uploads/how-to-create-multiple-desktops-with-mission-control.png)
That said, I feel a good basic support for cross platform standards and native clients is essential to get users (basic) access to the system. Mind if we would have kept alive the previous Mobile Server solution for GW we still would be stuck in the past. Well, everybody is more or less happy now we have the GW Mobility Pack.
#WHATS THE POINT OF MULTIPLE DESKTOPS ON MAC DOWNLOAD#
This contributes to the idea, which is true for the device market, that a user does want to use the default applications on the device and not want to download another (groupwise) app to access its corporate mail/calerdar/tasks/etc. I've not tested this yet myself nor had Novell at the time it was discussed (last Brainshare) and they doubt it would be official supported release but these protocols added in R2 should work also with for example Evolution on Linux. The work done in GW2014 R2 for Mac ( ) does also benefit Linux as I remember.